<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sun is not leading public opinion by backing the Tories, it&#8217;s merely following it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/09/30/the-sun-is-not-leading-public-opinion-by-backing-the-tories-its-merely-following-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/09/30/the-sun-is-not-leading-public-opinion-by-backing-the-tories-its-merely-following-it/</link>
	<description>&#60;h2&#62;A words-based weblog by Manchester journalist David Quinn&#60;/h2&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 15:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/09/30/the-sun-is-not-leading-public-opinion-by-backing-the-tories-its-merely-following-it/comment-page-1/#comment-20981</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/09/30/the-sun-is-not-leading-public-opinion-by-backing-the-tories-its-merely-following-it/#comment-20981</guid>
		<description>Hmm, as ever our thoughts converge. The sight of a powerful Cameron egged on by a rampant press, and Murdoch sensing new opportunities, won&#039;t be a pleasant one though.

Interested to read that Te Scottish Sun, or whatever the hell it&#039;s called, is being a little more circumspect, issuing Cameron with their own version of the &#039;do-what-we-say-if-you-want-our-backing&#039; ultimatum.

This is, presumably, because there are precisely eight Tories in Scotland. I&#039;m guessing this makes it hard for a red top to back them north of the border.

http://robinbrown.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/the-sun-drops-labour-but-there-are-wider-issues-at-stake/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, as ever our thoughts converge. The sight of a powerful Cameron egged on by a rampant press, and Murdoch sensing new opportunities, won&#8217;t be a pleasant one though.</p>
<p>Interested to read that Te Scottish Sun, or whatever the hell it&#8217;s called, is being a little more circumspect, issuing Cameron with their own version of the &#8216;do-what-we-say-if-you-want-our-backing&#8217; ultimatum.</p>
<p>This is, presumably, because there are precisely eight Tories in Scotland. I&#8217;m guessing this makes it hard for a red top to back them north of the border.</p>
<p><a href="http://robinbrown.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/the-sun-drops-labour-but-there-are-wider-issues-at-stake/" rel="nofollow">http://robinbrown.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/the-sun-drops-labour-but-there-are-wider-issues-at-stake/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

