<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Cameron says &#8220;twat&#8221; on live radio. Ooh, edgy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/07/29/david-cameron-twat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/07/29/david-cameron-twat/</link>
	<description>&#60;h2&#62;A words-based weblog by Manchester journalist David Quinn&#60;/h2&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:36:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/07/29/david-cameron-twat/comment-page-1/#comment-17831</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=429#comment-17831</guid>
		<description>Pretty much exactly my thoughts. I described it elsewhere on the web as Cameron&#039;s attempt at a Mondeo Man moment.

The sheer crapness of the swearing tells me this was scripted for the show&#039;s listeners from the get-go. Another reason Cameron is rubbish and over-rated - Blair would never have made this mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much exactly my thoughts. I described it elsewhere on the web as Cameron&#8217;s attempt at a Mondeo Man moment.</p>
<p>The sheer crapness of the swearing tells me this was scripted for the show&#8217;s listeners from the get-go. Another reason Cameron is rubbish and over-rated &#8211; Blair would never have made this mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverFox</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2009/07/29/david-cameron-twat/comment-page-1/#comment-17827</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=429#comment-17827</guid>
		<description>I personally think DC apologising has just given this story &#039;legs&#039;. No-one with a treble-digit IQ seriously regards the word &#039;twat&#039; as having its original meaning, any more than they would the word &#039;berk&#039;. Both were originally &#039;taboo offensive&#039; but the world - and especially common English usage - has moved on. Unfortunately I note that the Times has its pedantic and linguistic head firmly stuck up its bottom; you&#039;d think they&#039;d have had more sense. I expect a flurry of comments in the Saturday Feedback section.
I also think that we should henceforth regard &#039;twat&#039; as a useful synonym for all those saddos whose lives seem to have been taken over by Twitter (Sarah Brown and Stephen Fry spring to mind).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think DC apologising has just given this story &#8216;legs&#8217;. No-one with a treble-digit IQ seriously regards the word &#8216;twat&#8217; as having its original meaning, any more than they would the word &#8216;berk&#8217;. Both were originally &#8216;taboo offensive&#8217; but the world &#8211; and especially common English usage &#8211; has moved on. Unfortunately I note that the Times has its pedantic and linguistic head firmly stuck up its bottom; you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d have had more sense. I expect a flurry of comments in the Saturday Feedback section.<br />
I also think that we should henceforth regard &#8216;twat&#8217; as a useful synonym for all those saddos whose lives seem to have been taken over by Twitter (Sarah Brown and Stephen Fry spring to mind).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
