<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Car tax: A sandal-wearing lefty gets irate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/</link>
	<description>&#60;h2&#62;A words-based weblog by Manchester journalist David Quinn&#60;/h2&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:36:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sell your car</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/comment-page-1/#comment-13207</link>
		<dc:creator>sell your car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=236#comment-13207</guid>
		<description>Very bad idea to increase road tax! Aren&#039;t we paying enough nowadays to the gov?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very bad idea to increase road tax! Aren&#8217;t we paying enough nowadays to the gov?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/comment-page-1/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=236#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>Out of touch politicians are using the myth of Global warming as a cover for huge tax increases. Let&#039;s face it, if they were serious about carbon footprints there would be a solar panel on each new house and there would be a tax on new born babies, since they will all have a footprint of their own.
It&#039;s all just a swindle. Clean air yes but you don&#039;t need to use the public, usually the poorest, to pay for other government expenditure. Wake up &amp; wise up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of touch politicians are using the myth of Global warming as a cover for huge tax increases. Let&#8217;s face it, if they were serious about carbon footprints there would be a solar panel on each new house and there would be a tax on new born babies, since they will all have a footprint of their own.<br />
It&#8217;s all just a swindle. Clean air yes but you don&#8217;t need to use the public, usually the poorest, to pay for other government expenditure. Wake up &#038; wise up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/comment-page-1/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=236#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>A good point well made but can I ask one thing? Is your plastic bag recycling to off-set the fact that you chose to buy one of the biggest and thus less economical engines in the range?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good point well made but can I ask one thing? Is your plastic bag recycling to off-set the fact that you chose to buy one of the biggest and thus less economical engines in the range?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/comment-page-1/#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=236#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>By the way, where&#039;s this new cars-more-polluting-than-old-cars come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, where&#8217;s this new cars-more-polluting-than-old-cars come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/06/06/car-tax-a-sandal-wearing-lefty-gets-irate/comment-page-1/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/?p=236#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>This retrospective tax is possibly the worst idea I&#039;ve ever heard of. How it qualifies as a green tax I&#039;m not sure, as the very idea of a green tax is surely one that dissuades people from following a certain course of action: buying a new and polluting car for example. 

The real issue here is that it will have the effect of convincing people that all green taxes are simply a swindle. That&#039;s what&#039;s annoying - there&#039;s a logical and moral case for increasing road tax on new vehicles, and (debatably) maintaining above-inflation increases in fuel duty. There&#039;s no such case for retrospective VED.

If Brown doesn&#039;t drop it he&#039;ll be finished. In itself it&#039;s a stupid tax, along with everything else it&#039;s the straw that broke the camel&#039;s back. If he does drop it he&#039;ll look weak and confused. Motorists, reminded by the increasingly strong and slightly sinister car lobby, will abandon labour for a decade. Great move, Gordon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This retrospective tax is possibly the worst idea I&#8217;ve ever heard of. How it qualifies as a green tax I&#8217;m not sure, as the very idea of a green tax is surely one that dissuades people from following a certain course of action: buying a new and polluting car for example. </p>
<p>The real issue here is that it will have the effect of convincing people that all green taxes are simply a swindle. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s annoying &#8211; there&#8217;s a logical and moral case for increasing road tax on new vehicles, and (debatably) maintaining above-inflation increases in fuel duty. There&#8217;s no such case for retrospective VED.</p>
<p>If Brown doesn&#8217;t drop it he&#8217;ll be finished. In itself it&#8217;s a stupid tax, along with everything else it&#8217;s the straw that broke the camel&#8217;s back. If he does drop it he&#8217;ll look weak and confused. Motorists, reminded by the increasingly strong and slightly sinister car lobby, will abandon labour for a decade. Great move, Gordon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
