<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You with me? Then let&#8217;s get synergistic!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/02/22/you-with-me-then-lets-get-synergistic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/02/22/you-with-me-then-lets-get-synergistic/</link>
	<description>&#60;h2&#62;A words-based weblog by Manchester journalist David Quinn&#60;/h2&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 15:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/02/22/you-with-me-then-lets-get-synergistic/comment-page-1/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordsdept.co.uk/2008/02/22/you-with-me-then-lets-get-synergistic/#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>&#039;Data solutions&#039; seem to be the new silicon chips, Web 2.0 or, if you will, white elephant. The whole premise does seem to be that you can&#039;t possibly do your job unless you have access to a bafflingly wide-ranged and deeply complex array of largely irrelevant information that might somehow make your job slightly easier to do. 

These solutions are inveitably hugely expensive, preumably why investors and share-holders are taking note. I wonder if a share price would similarly improve if an employer announced that it was executing half of its workforce - no pesky pay-offs.

So I can see the attraction. I do wonder, though, if the bubble will burst at some point and everyone realises that the information is just a massive waste of time and actually getting on with your job is probably a better return on investment. 

Finally:  &#039;Those who survived chief executive Sir Crispin Davis&#039;s presentation&#039;. Heh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Data solutions&#8217; seem to be the new silicon chips, Web 2.0 or, if you will, white elephant. The whole premise does seem to be that you can&#8217;t possibly do your job unless you have access to a bafflingly wide-ranged and deeply complex array of largely irrelevant information that might somehow make your job slightly easier to do. </p>
<p>These solutions are inveitably hugely expensive, preumably why investors and share-holders are taking note. I wonder if a share price would similarly improve if an employer announced that it was executing half of its workforce &#8211; no pesky pay-offs.</p>
<p>So I can see the attraction. I do wonder, though, if the bubble will burst at some point and everyone realises that the information is just a massive waste of time and actually getting on with your job is probably a better return on investment. </p>
<p>Finally:  &#8216;Those who survived chief executive Sir Crispin Davis&#8217;s presentation&#8217;. Heh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

